How Does a Vaccine Get “Mandated” for School?

State of Vermont vaccination regulations (copy here) state that

“The Vermont Recommended Immunization Schedule is based on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) as approved and published by the Centers for Disease Control.” [underline added for emphasis]

(Note it is only recommended but parents who wish NOT to follow the recommendations must file an EXEMPTION (see forms tab on our main menu)

Vermont’s vaccination regulations also state that

The Commissioner of Health shall annually convene the Vermont Immunization Advisory Council (VIAC) to assist in the determination of whether the Immunization Schedule found in Section 7 of this rule should be updated in accordance with the published Centers for Disease Control (CDC) immunization schedule. The Commissioner may convene additional meeting of the Council as necessary.”

and

Following release of a CDC vaccine recommendation, a two-year phase-in period will pass before children and students may be required to have the vaccine in order to enroll in a child care facility or school.” and ” If necessary to protect the public’s health, the Commissioner may require a shorter phase-in period.”

All of the above  went into effect July 1, 2016 – but as of the time of this writing, the Vermont Immunization Advisory Council (VIAC)  has never been convened.

This youtube video will give the reader an understanding of how ACIP votes on a new vaccine recommendation.

This video is an excerpt of the February 2018 ACIP meeting.

Full meeting here.

Like videos?

Watch our entire youtube playlist here.

Watch vaccine consumer video testimonials here.

1/16/2018: Third Dose of MMR Triple Shot Recommended by CDC

The CDC vaccine division, “an edifice of fraud” according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , has just recommended a 3rd dose of Merck’s MMR-II vaccine, citing the willingness of parents to accept such a proposal as one part of their rationale.

Add this to the explosive list of shots for babies – most of which are required for school.

In Their Recommendation for Use of a Third Dose of Mumps Virus–Containing Vaccine During an Outbreak, published January 12, 2018, CDC cites weak science supporting effectiveness and safety of the approach:

– Three epidemiologic studies among persons who received a third dose during the panic of a mumps outbreak (only one study demonstrated statistical significance)

– Two titer studies measuring mumps virus–specific antibodies after a third dose of MMR (antibodies were increased one month after vaccination, and declined to near baseline by 1 year after vaccination). CDC notes that, “In the absence of a correlate of protection that would define the level of antibodies needed to protect a person from mumps disease, the clinical significance of these laboratory findings is unclear.

It did not seem to raise any eyebrows that the triply vaccinated young adults suffered from the following conditions: lymphadenopathy (12%), diarrhea (9%), headache (7%), and joint pain (6%).

Instead, CDC declared the third dose to be safe and effective, adding:

“Experts concluded that students and parents place high value on preventing mumps and its complications as well as preventing the harms associated with loss of productivity that can occur with mumps disease. Experts also concluded students and parents do not have concerns about safety of a third dose of MMR vaccine.”

The experts were apparently not concerned about the 2014 CDC Whistleblower, the fact that there is absolutely zero liability for the companies that make these products, nor for the government employees and nor for the advisors who design the schedule, which then becomes mandatory for school children.  State tort law is preempted by National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act [42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b)(1)], which states:

  “[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”

Should injury occur (vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” because they represent an artificial intrusion into the immune system), the burden falls on the family.

This parent, for one, has concerns. These shots are being increasingly forced on those who do not want them (see removal of parent philosophical exemption in Vermont and personal belief exemption in California). And there is no liability. Hello? What are the long term consequences of these recommendations? With no liability, there is no market pressure, no incentive for the “experts” to answer this question.

Mumps outbreaks have been occurring for the last several years now in fully vaccinated populations.

Maybe it is time to seriously investigate the fraud claims of the Merck virologists who allegedly, “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings” – cited the following lawsuits and whistleblower actions:

Jennifer Stella

February, 2015

NEW! Toolkit – use this information to advocate for your rights.

Legislative Update:

  • February Update, WGDR radio. (~ 2/16/2015~)
  • The science is not settled.  (~ read more ~)
  • Pandemic Preparedness – is it about health? (ACLU, 2008 ~)

***ACTION NEEDED NOW***

Action Needed:

– Oppose H98/S53 “Reportable Disease Registries and Data“(…more)

– Amend S9, – crime of “failure to protect” (…more)

– Oppose H.212, Repeal of philosophical & religious exemptions (…more)

Read Bill Text:

  • Which is Greater Threat, Measles or Measles Vaccine? by Jeffrey Dach, M.D. (…more)
  • Is Discussing the Safety of Vaccines the Third Rail of Pediatrics?
    by Lawrence D. Rosen, M.D. (…more)
  • What is the Philosophical Exemption? (…more)
  • Freedom of Conscience. (more)

Screen shot 2015-02-14 at 1.38.03 AM

“Vaccine choice” is not about political affiliation, or economic status.

It is an issue of civil rights and of parental rights.

Will you protect the human right to informed consent in medical risk taking…?

 (click HERE for information on how to have your concerns be heard by lawmakers…)

2/8/2015: March of Dimes, AAP, VAHHS, Building Bright Futures Representative call for repeal of philosophical vaccine exemptions in Vermont…click here for more.

2/7/2015 – Greg Dobbs: In defense of parents who don’t vaccinate (Denver Post)

http://vp.telvue.com/preview?id=T01479&video=226287

Studies Show that Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease (Weston A. Price Foundation).

Protecting the Immunocompromised: (see page 113 – Johns Hopkins Medicine recommends avoiding the recently vaccinated).

Spotlight on measles 2010: Excretion of vaccine strain measles virus in urine and pharyngeal secretions of a child with vaccine associated febrile rash illness, Croatia, March 2010

“We describe excretion of measles vaccine strain Schwarz in a child who developed a febrile rash illness eight days after primary immunisation against measles, mumps and rubella. Throat swabs and urine specimens were collected on the fifth and sixth day of illness, respectively. Genotyping demonstrated measles vaccine strain Schwarz (genotype A). If measles and rubella were not under enhanced surveillance in Croatia, the case would have been either misreported as rubella or not recognised at all.”

<>Do Vaccines Promote Health?<> –  (our questions start at 17:22 – link to VPR). 

 

September, 2014

  • Congressional Briefing on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (attended by staffer of Peter Welch).
  • Vermont’s Gubernatorial candidates support parental authority on vaccine decisions, unless uninformed on the issue… (VPR, listen from 1:16:50-1:18:05).
  • 9/24 Fearless Parent Radio ~Are Vaccines Safe? ~  Barbara Loe Fisher with Larry Palevsky, MD (LISTEN)
  • Environmental Health 2014: “Among the suspected toxins surveyed, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, aluminum adjuvants, and the herbicide glyphosate have increasing trends that correlate positively to the rise in autism.”
  • Timeline of events on CDC Whistleblower Dr. W. Thompson from healthchoice.org
  • Parents who believe that vaccines induced autism in their children launch massive video campaign (more).
  • Explore the Pro’s and Con’s of Vaccination at Procon.org.
  • Statement of William W. Thompson, Ph.D., Senior CDC Scientist, Regarding the 2004 Article Examining the Possibility of  Relationship Between MMR Vaccine and Autism (via his attorneys –link).
  • Maine Voices: Breakdown in accountability at heart of decline in vaccinations (Portland Press Herald).