Policemen seize computers, files from Italian scientists who reported on vaccine contamination…

Drs Antonietta Gatti and Stephano Montanari reported in 2017 about their shocking finding about nano particle contamination in vaccines. Last summer, millions of Italians took to the streets in protest of a new law proposed to make vaccinations mandatory in the country (read more).

Dr. Gatti was recently interviewed by James Lyons-Weiler (link here) about his research that, according to Tv qui Telestudio Modena, Italia , had created a certain uproar within the Ministry of Health and throughout the Italian scientific world.

As of 22 February 2018, Gatti’s files have been seized.

In personal communication, Gatti says the goal is to silence communication about their research, linked below.

Source:  Gatti AM, Montanari S (2016) New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 4(1): 00072. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2017.04.00072


update: Italian news from google translate “The blitz of the Yellow Flames took place yesterday morning at the home and in the laboratory of Nanodiagnostic, the 68-year-old pharmacist Stefano Montanari and his wife, Dr. Antonietta Gatti. The Guardia di Finanza has seized all the computers and numerous documents concerning research on nanopathologies, which husband and wife in several cases have claimed to find in the vaccines to be administered to minors. Research that had created a certain uproar within the Ministry of Health and throughout the Italian scientific world, raising quite a few criticisms. An avid anti-vaccinist supporter, Montanari is accused of fraud by the Reggio Emilia Public Prosecutor’s Office. The answer from Montanari was not long in coming and came through his Facebook profile, where he claims to have been heavily damaged and unable to continue his business. The studies of the pharmacist, now famous throughout Italy, will be postponed to a date to be allocated while waiting for the relevant bodies to clarify the matter.”



~Jennifer Stella


Mumps in Vermont?

The vaccine campaign descends…

Well that didn’t take long…. JUST ONE MONTH after we wrote of the third dose of MMR being green-lighted, the college clinics have begun. Not a moment to spare when there are profits to be made~! This despite the fact that 8 of 10 cases tested, came back negative for mumps at UVM. 

NOTE: Persons can request a blood test (titer) which may verify immunity (this can be done for measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis, or varicella) rather than indiscriminately vaccinating.

8 of 10 tested were negative http://www.wcax.com/content/news/Most-suspected-mumps-cases-at-UVM-come-back-negative-474190663.html

Third dose – we wrote about it here: http://www.vaxchoicevt.com/2018/01/16/1-16-2018/
Parents are reporting their unvaccinated college students are being called by “health services” on VT college campuses.
These students are being told “mumps are at our doorstep”; 
They are being told to get a shot (“its perfectly safe”); 
They are being told without the shot they will have to leave campus for one month; even after clinical history of having had mumps as a child.
Again, Persons can request a blood test (titer) which may verify immunity (this can be done for measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis, or varicella) rather than indiscriminately vaccinating. Titer testing is actually cheaper than vaccinating!
 Jennifer Stella

 A Humbling Exposé into the Creation of Mortality Rates and it’s Impact on Our Public Health Beliefs and Choices 

A Humbling Exposé into the Creation of Mortality Rates and it’s Impact on Our Public Health Beliefs and Choices


My dear friends and family,

I work with doctors, coroners and the local county registrars every day to create death records. It’s what I do for a living and wanted to share my thoughts on the mortality rates being thrown around on main stream and social media regarding the influenza ‘epidemic’. Please note: This information I am sharing is not limited to influenza reporting, but rather, serves as a case study of how the mortality rate recording system (mal)functions at large.

I am sorry to say that death rates are NOT as simple nor as valid as every news broadcaster with perfectly-trained vocal delivery makes them sound, and they are absolutely not the infallible pillar of medical history as the CDC purports.

Our current system for capturing mortality rates can and does provide a mostly uninvestigated and inaccurate picture of what causes a death. The process for creating and registering causes of death for public records is a complicated, convoluted, politicized, completely open to both ignorance and the manipulations of personal, professional, and governmental interests.   Continue reading ” A Humbling Exposé into the Creation of Mortality Rates and it’s Impact on Our Public Health Beliefs and Choices “

Peace, Love, Flags… and Ground War???

“Mounting a ground war against anti-vaxxers.”

This Boston Globe editorial quotes a Vermont State employee. Does the State of Vermont endorse such language, which portends violence against a group of citizens?

Just one week after US Marine Gen. Robert Neller warned that a conflict with North Korea could involve an exceptionally bloody ground war, the Boston Globe quietly printed an editorial, titled:  “Mounting a ground war against anti-vaxxers.”

This Globe editorial quotes a Vermont State employee and concludes by saying that , “Wise state policy, micro-targeted toward local schools and communities, is the best remedy for anti-vax luddites… who are noisy peddlers of a conspiracy-centric belief system that’s more akin to religious zeal than science.

A “ground war” against those who have vaccine safety concerns? Against those who choose alternate pathways to wellness? Against those who watched their children’s health demise after shots?

See: Vaccine Consumer Injury Testimonials Recorded in Burlington, Vermont.

Ground War. This is not something to be taken lightly. Is this the sort of image that Vermont wishes to associate itself with, as state employees, working with the CDC and pharma, attempt to convince more Vermonters to take a flu shot, or to vaccinate their babies to get them into daycare – or else?

It will be a very, very kinetic, physical, violent fight over some really, really tough ground and everybody is going to have to be mentally prepared,” said  Neller, as quoted by CNN.

No kidding.

Although the editorial title was chosen by the Boston Globe, we would like to know:

Does the State of Vermont endorse such language, which portends violence against a group of citizens?

We would also like to know whether our health department played a role in this editorial. And: why are the Vermont data quoted in the article not available to the general public?   We are growing tired of being stonewalled by the Vermont Department of Health.

So, on the very same day that many community members were raising a (political) flag in honor of the fact that ALL OF US MATTER, we sent a letter to the Governor. Here is a copy of the 2/2/2018 letter I wrote on behalf of our group. For the record – we agree that black lives do matter. Just look at the work we have undertaken to get people to understand the revelations of the CDC Whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson.

On February 6, 2018  the “Immunization Program 2017 Annual Report” suddenly appeared on the healthvermont.gov  website. The report was supposed to be delivered by January 15, 2018 to the Legislature, but it does not appear anywhere on the list of the Legislature’s “reports due.” It got posted on Feb. 6th to the website but was never delivered to the legislature. Why not?
Of note: The most recent (2017/2018) “Child Care – Annual Immunization Survey” and “K-12 Public and Independent Schools – Annual Immunization Report” remain missing, despite the fact  they would have been needed to write the annual report that was released. Where are the data?
In 2014, the Vermont Health Department openly schemed about “using data to your advantage.” Perhaps withholding data from the public will give “them” (who supposedly work for “us”) some sort of advantage in the ground war??? 
Aside from the new report appearing on the website (thanks!), Governor Scott’s office sent a bland and impotent response on February 8th.
Thank you for reaching out to express your concerns over the recent Boston Globe editorial,the staffer wrote.  “As we understand, Commissioner Levine has also received your inquiry, and the Department of Health we be in touch with you to address your concerns.”
The letter was unsigned.

We look forward to hearing more from Dr. Levine. Perhaps he is just slightly more outraged.

For the record, we did not start this “war” that is apparently being waged. We were (all of us – unvaccinated, vaccine injured, partly vaccined, those many not even thinking one iota about vaccines, etcetera) –  living, quietly, happily, peacefully and healthfully, here in our beloved state – until were were attacked by zealots who care only about killing natural health options while delivering more drugs to more people in an effort to make more money faster.

May peace be with you in these troubling times.


~ Jennifer Stella

Protection for Parents Who Have Religious or Moral Objections to Vaccination?

It seems that the US Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is “pulling a 180” and will now make efforts to enforce the protection of our rights of conscience in healthcare.  This a ray of sunshine for those with religious beliefs or moral convictions who desire the ability to make a free choice without coercion – but it should be interpreted with caution. More analysis is needed.

Search the rule and you will find ten different references to vaccination. DHHS uses the following specific language in the proposed rule, as an example of what might warrant a complaint and enforcement against entities receiving federal funding:

…being required to administer or receive certain vaccinations derived from aborted fetal tissues as a condition of work or receipt of educational services.”

It is a little known fact that in addition to viruses and bacteria, vaccines contain very small amounts of other ingredients (excipients and media) – including human diploid cells.

Parents object to vaccines for a wide variety of reasons.  In 1979, when parents first encountered the idea of compulsory schoolchild vaccination brought about by Dr. Roberta Coffin, their rights as parents to hold religious or moral objections against one or all vaccines, were protected in the form of “exemptions.”  Senators carefully crafted the wording and intended to preserve parent choice. Doctors of the time fully supported this.

Times have changed. There is no longer any liability and no consumer protection when it comes to vaccine products. When recently faced with the dilemma, our legislature and Governor failed to protect us.

It seems the pendulum may reaching the point at which it will swing in the other direction. I will await further analysis by the legal experts but it seems to me that if this rule is approved, entities tied to a Federal revenue stream who coerce parents to vaccinate against their conscience (moral or religious beliefs), could risk their funding and must place notifications to patients and providers of the civil right to conscience in healthcare decisions. And for those unlucky enough to live in California, West Virginia or Mississippi there may be hope.

The DHHS Rule proposes to treat moral or religious belief as a a civil right – much like race, color or nation of origin.

The Department proposes to uphold the maximum protection for the rights of conscience and the broadest prohibition on discrimination provided by Federal, State, or local law, as consistent with the Constitution. Where a State or local law provides as much or greater protection than Federal law for religious freedom and moral convictions, the Department will not construe Federal law to preempt or impair the application of that law, unless expressly provided.”

More information from US DHHS:

Proposed Rule by US Dept. of Health and Human Services: “Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority”



In the regulation of health care, the United States has a long history of providing conscience-based protections for individuals and entities with objections to certain activities based on religious belief and moral convictions. Multiple such statutory protections apply to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS, or the Department) and the programs or activities it funds or administers. The Department proposes to revise regulations previously promulgated to ensure that persons or entities are not subjected to certain practices or policies that violate conscience, coerce, or discriminate, in violation of such Federal laws. Through this rulemaking, the Department proposes to grant overall responsibility to its Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for ensuring that the Department, its components, HHS programs and activities, and those who participate in HHS programs or activities comply with Federal laws protecting the rights of conscience and prohibiting associated discriminatory policies and practices in such programs and activities. In addition to conducting outreach and providing technical assistance, OCR will have the authority to initiate compliance reviews, conduct investigations, supervise and coordinate compliance by the Department and its components, and use enforcement tools otherwise available in civil rights law to address violations and resolve complaints. In order to ensure that recipients of Federal financial assistance and other Department funds comply with their legal obligations, the Department will require certain recipients to maintain records; cooperate with OCR’s investigations, reviews, or other enforcement actions; submit written assurances and certifications of compliance to the Department; and provide notice to individuals and entities about their conscience and associated anti-discrimination rights, as applicable.


Submit comments on or before March 27, 2018 – MUST BE identified by RIN 0945-ZA03 or Docket HHS-OCR-2018-0002,

  • You may submit electronic comments at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for the Docket ID number HHS-OCR-2018-0002. Follow the instructions for sending comments.
  • Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail:S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Attention: Conscience NPRM, RIN 0945-ZA03, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 509F, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201.
  • Hand Delivery/Courier: Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Attention: Conscience NPRM, RIN 0945-ZA03, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 509F, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201.

~ Jennifer Stella

PS: Ginger Taylor has also written about this, here.

Dengue Vaccine: A Clear Example of Why it Must be the Parent’s Choice

Updated: March 15, 2018

Sanofi will decide shortly whether to seek regulatory approval for its dengue vaccine Dengvaxia in the United States and remains committed to the medicine despite a health scare in the Philippines, a senior executive said on Wednesday.” – Reuters 3/8/2018

If you follow the (below) chronology of the Philippines’ dengue vaccine fiasco, in which the drug maker (Sanofi) rushed to market to be first, convinced top level government officials to buy the product, and then 800,000 Filipino schoolchildren were injected, and 14 died, you will see in front of you a clear example of why vaccines should NEVER be mandatory for school.

These tragic circumstances are precisely why philosophical vaccine exemptions were enacted into state immunization laws in the first place, and should be protected at all costs.

The whole situation, as one Steemit contributor wrote, is “damning condemnation and a horrifyingly cautionary tale about how greed, ambition and hubris can lead to catastrophic tragedies.”

The government and the drug maker deny any connection.

As with all other vaccines, the risks associated with Denvaxia were fairly known, if not scientifically well understood, before launch – and since vaccine is an artificial intrusion into the immune system all of them are “unavoidably unsafe” to some extent.

Sanofi predicts to lose 100 million euro – peanuts for them. What of the children given the vaccine which was produced in Vero cells using recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering)? Vero cells are a “continuous” line of green monkey cells.

 In mass vaccination programs, the sad fact is that some children will be sickened and die from the product. The medical-pharmaceutical industry takes this as cost of doing business, but never factors these losses in to the cost effectiveness calculations they present. Parents everywhere should always have the choice and never be faced with loss of their child’s institutional education if they decide not to take the risk.

As a side-note: Unwitting Vermont volunteers were compensated $3000 so their bodies could be used for the UVM vaccine research trial. I wonder how they all are doing?

~Jennifer Stella



Dengue Vaccine News Chronology –  2013 through 2018

Jan 22, 2018 – Former Health Secretary Enrique Ona faced the Senate blue ribbon committee for the first time on Monday, January 22, where he slammed the Aquino administration’s implementation of the now-controversial P3.5-billion dengue vaccination program. https://911ph.com/2018/01/22/ex-doh-chief-ona-says-he-would-not-have-okd-dengue-vaccine/

First they said it looked like measles, now they ask… Does immunity after Zika virus infection cross-protect against dengue?

Jan 24, 2018 – Shocker:: After deaths, illness & #disease from their dengue vaccine in the Philippines, drug maker presents “cost effectiveness” conclusion~!! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X17316638

Jan 22, 2018

Ex-DOH chief Ona says he would not have OK’d dengue vaccine

Jan 18, 2018 – 5 more deaths linked to Dengvaxia for referral to UP-PGH http://northboundasia.com/2018/01/18/5-deaths-linked-dengvaxia-referral-pgh/

Jan 17, 2018 – Sanofi agrees refund for unused ‘killer’ anti-dengue vaccine: The French pharmaceutical giant denied the refund was related to safety issues, but was instead meant to improve ties with Philippine health authorities. http://nismagazine.com/2018/01/17/sanofi-agrees-refund-for-unused-killer-anti-dengue-vaccine.html

Jan 16, 2018 – “The findings of the forensic pathologists are consistent with severe dengue or dengue shock syndrome” https://www.rappler.com/nation/193439-philippines-deaths-vaccine-row-consistent-dengue

Jan 1, 2018 –  Was Aquino’s P3.5B purchase of the dengue vaccine the worst case of corruption ever? 


Jan 11, 2018
MANILA – Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) probes death of 6th child dead after newly launched dengue vaccine http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/11/18/pao-probes-death-of-5th-child-who-received-dengue-vaccine

Jan 1, 2018
DOH to check on reported Denvaxia dengue vaccine deaths” – Dec 21, 2017… 


Jan 1, 2018 

- Worst of 2017: Sanofi’s Dengue vaccine launch turns into nightmare; stock prices plunge, Takeda now… 


Dec 23, 2017 
- “Forensic team examines body of girl vaccinated with Dengvaxia” https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/954425/forensic-examination-pao-dengvaxia-dengue-vaccine-anjielica-pestilos

Dec 23, 2017 – Bataan girl died of dengue after vaccination: VACC http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/12/07/17/bataan-girl-died-of-dengue-after-vaccination-vacc

Dec 7, 2017 – Father seeks justice for daughter who died of dengue 6 months after Dengvaxia shot | News | GMA News Online http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/635711/father-of-student-who-died-after-getting-dengvaxia-shot-wants-justice/story/#undefined.gbpl.uxfs.uxfs

Dec 27, 2016 – Meanwhile, in the Philippines…Senate probes dengue vaccine program… 


Apr 27, 2016 – Dengue vaccine trial in Philippines: one coincidental death out of 200,000 


Apr 5, 2016 – Safety of dengue vaccine questionable, schoolchildren serve as guinea pigs https://web.archive.org/web/20160917091555/http://interaksyon.com:80/article/126028/who-stays-out-of-dengue-vaccine-controversy
(this one has been taken down but thanks to the internet archive you can still read it.)

Mar 22, 2016 – There is a “clinical similarity and serological cross reactivity of dengue fever and measles”? You don’t say…… https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article/19/4/268/1816028

Feb 11, 2016 – “Crop-Sprayed Villages regarding Dengue-Zika, microcephaly…” http://www.reduas.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/02/Informe-Zika-de-Reduas_TRAD.pdf

Jan 21, 2016 – Dengue vaccine only gives patients 47% protection… http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2016/01/21/dengue-vaccine-only-gives-patients-47-protection/

Jan 14, 2016 – More

 dengue vaccines: aluminum, novel adjuvants, GMOS, what could possibly go wrong?… http://www.denguevaccines.org/subunit-and-inactivated-vaccines/

Jan 6, 2016 – More

 than 1 million nine-year-old Filipino children to become part of dengue vaccine experiment ‪#CDCwhistleblower…


Dec 23, 2015 – Sanofi gets green light from Philippines FDA 

Jul 16, 2014 – “We cannot solve the dengue problem with a vaccine alone, especially not with this vaccine…” http://www.dw.com/en/experts-see-flaws-in-promising-dengue-fever-vaccine-candidate/a-17789632?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf

Sept 8, 2016 – Dengue vaccine could make things worse: ‘We should be careful in considering where and how to use this vaccine’ http://outbreaknewstoday.com/dengue-vaccine-could-make-things-worse-we-should-be-careful-in-considering-where-and-how-to-use-this-vaccine-24652/

Dec 22, 2015 – Vaccine: Not good enough for Singapore (2014)…


Nov 24, 2014 – Clinical similarity and serological cross reactivity of dengue fever and measles -… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776393

Jul 16, 2014 – Vaccine “not equally good for all four subtypes of dengue viruses, and that could be dangerous.”… http://www.dw.com/en/experts-see-flaws-in-promising-dengue-fever-vaccine-candidate/a-17789632?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf

Mar 25, 2014 – Sanofi bets big on dengue vaccine despite poor performance…. https://seekingalpha.com/news/1643013-sanofi-bets-big-on-dengue-vaccine?isDirectRoadblock=false

Oct 18, 2013 – More newsflash: Did you know that clinical signs and symptoms of dengue are similar to those of measles…?… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1486671

Aug 12, 2013 – Someone asked what UVM is offering for that immune system experiment / dengue vaccine trial. Here is your answer: $3000 (see pic above).

Aug 4, 2013 – Blockbuster Sanofi Dengue Vaccine Marketing Begins:… https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-04/sanofi-dengue-bid-seen-as-2-6-billion-hit-or-major-flop

July 12, 2013 – I suspect that dengue is about to become *more* widespread, *more* deadly, and *vaccine preventable*… https://in.reuters.com/article/us-sanofi-dengue-vaccine/sanofi-starts-dengue-vaccine-production-to-keep-lead-over-rivals-idINBRE96B0D120130712

June 22, 2013 – Vaccine Maker Sanofi is in full Pre-Launch phase of Marketing Campaign for Dengue Vaccine… https://www.pharmaasia.com/2013/06/sanofi-pasteur-supports-3rd-asean-dengue-day/3/

March 5, 2013 – Have you heard anything about the vaccine for dengue fever being tested here in VT? Based on quick research, it is a trial for a vaccine to be used for “biodefense” http://globalbiodefense.com/2012/11/28/army-dengue-vaccine-trial-supported-by-state-university-of-new-york/; (which may mean they may be willing to tolerate a higher rate of adverse reactions). The vaccine was developed at NIH and began phase I in 2010.

Another news release here, from 2013, mentions VT…

Here is the public statement from UVM.… and here are the “protocols” for all of the Vermont trials, which leave out details like adjuvant, placebo, etc.

1/16/2018: Third Dose of MMR Triple Shot Recommended by CDC

The CDC vaccine division, “an edifice of fraud” according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , has just recommended a 3rd dose of Merck’s MMR-II vaccine, citing the willingness of parents to accept such a proposal as one part of their rationale.

Add this to the explosive list of shots for babies – most of which are required for school.

In Their Recommendation for Use of a Third Dose of Mumps Virus–Containing Vaccine During an Outbreak, published January 12, 2018, CDC cites weak science supporting effectiveness and safety of the approach:

– Three epidemiologic studies among persons who received a third dose during the panic of a mumps outbreak (only one study demonstrated statistical significance)

– Two titer studies measuring mumps virus–specific antibodies after a third dose of MMR (antibodies were increased one month after vaccination, and declined to near baseline by 1 year after vaccination). CDC notes that, “In the absence of a correlate of protection that would define the level of antibodies needed to protect a person from mumps disease, the clinical significance of these laboratory findings is unclear.

It did not seem to raise any eyebrows that the triply vaccinated young adults suffered from the following conditions: lymphadenopathy (12%), diarrhea (9%), headache (7%), and joint pain (6%).

Instead, CDC declared the third dose to be safe and effective, adding:

“Experts concluded that students and parents place high value on preventing mumps and its complications as well as preventing the harms associated with loss of productivity that can occur with mumps disease. Experts also concluded students and parents do not have concerns about safety of a third dose of MMR vaccine.”

The experts were apparently not concerned about the 2014 CDC Whistleblower, the fact that there is absolutely zero liability for the companies that make these products, nor for the government employees and nor for the advisors who design the schedule, which then becomes mandatory for school children.  State tort law is preempted by National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act [42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b)(1)], which states:

  “[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”

Should injury occur (vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” because they represent an artificial intrusion into the immune system), the burden falls on the family.

This parent, for one, has concerns. These shots are being increasingly forced on those who do not want them (see removal of parent philosophical exemption in Vermont and personal belief exemption in California). And there is no liability. Hello? What are the long term consequences of these recommendations? With no liability, there is no market pressure, no incentive for the “experts” to answer this question.

Mumps outbreaks have been occurring for the last several years now in fully vaccinated populations.

Maybe it is time to seriously investigate the fraud claims of the Merck virologists who allegedly, “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings” – cited the following lawsuits and whistleblower actions:

Jennifer Stella

Jan. 13, 2018: SIDS and US Infant Mortality Rates

A new study from Johns Hopkins reveals childhood mortality trends from 1961 to 2010 in the United States and 19 economically similar countries.
Researchers found that childhood mortality in the U.S. has been higher than all other peer nations since the 1980s; over the 50-year study period, the U.S.’s “lagging improvement” has amounted to more than 600,000 excess deaths.
Among the leading causes of death for the most recent decade, the researchers say, were premature births and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Children in the U.S. were three times more likely to die from prematurity at birth and more than twice as likely to die from SIDS.”


Jan. 1, 2018: The True Cost of Mass Vaccination

updated, Jan. 5, 2018

What is the true cost of mass vaccination?

Here in tiny little Vermont, where we have  only 625,000 inhabitants, our state  plans to spend almost 17 million dollars buying vaccine product in 2018. Full details on this purchase plan may be found here –http://www.vtvaccine.org/vtvaccine.nsf/WebEvents/71E8875583526E888525816F00471054; with calculation workbook found on this page at “2018 Amended Assessment Workbook V5 10 27 2017.pdf.”
From the workbook, you can see that the state is planning to purchase 60,855 doses for adults and 254,045 doses for children. And although they are also supplementing with federal funds the total spend for Vermont on product alone is nearly $17 million dollars, with the average cost (not including doctors’ billing fees) working out to be over $50 per shot!

Some will say that the dollars spent work out to be some sort of huge cost savings over the long term. It is our understanding there was no bidding process on this. Even so, make no mistake, vaccinations can be a boon to small practices.  In this video, Dr.  Jamie Loehr, MD, FAAFP teaches others how to make a steady income on pushing those vaccines and protecting that bottom line in his video, “Minimizing costs and maximizing reimbursement can make immunizations profitable.” (Fam Pract Manag. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(2):24-29.)

Two bigger questions begin to arise here.

(1) With so many in Vermont not interested** in taking their “recommended vaccines,”  how much of this vaccine product (money) is wasted? and

(2) how many unwanted, unexpected, and unwarned vaccine side effects are costing us even more money in long term health costs?

Of course there is also a human impact.


  • On average, about one Vermonter per year is reported disabled after vaccination.
  • In recent years there have been several deaths reported, and dozens of emergency room visits per year in Vermont, reported after vaccination.

On April 24, 2017, The Journal of Transitional Science published one of the first surveys to formally assess the longer-term health outcomes associated with the United States routine childhood vaccination program. Key Findings:
– Vaccinated children were less likely than unvaccinated children to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis.
– Vaccinated children were more likely than unvaccinated children to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and neuro-developmental disorders such as: learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.

The authors called for further research with larger samples and stronger research designs.

Mawson AR, Ray BD, Bhuiyan AR, Jacob B (2017) Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children. J Transl Sci 3: DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186

Read the study at: http://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php#Article_Info

The vaccine industry certainly has a lot of help in Vermont in achieving their goals of increasing profits. There is the AAP, Building Bright Futures (an offshoot of the AAP), the ob-gyn (who gives HPV vaccine to patients) in the statehouse who runs bills promoting forced vaccination, the medical industry and drug industry lobbyists, and now we have our own State Health Department spending tens of millions on vaccine doses, promoting vaccines, and advocating for their use to be mandatory (as they did so in 2012 and 2015). In 2015 in Vermont, parents lost their right to file philosophical objections against mandatory school, college and daycare vaccinations. The industry push, which was a blitz that took only 29 days, was fierce.

How shall Vermonters protect themselves from the future prospects of mandatory (forced) vaccines ?

A tiny little baby step is in passing H.247.

From the Caledonian Record:

State Rep. Vicki Strong, R-Albany, is working with those concerned with vaccinations in Vermont, and has proposed a bill, H.247, aimed at requiring the Vermont Department of Health to submit an annual report to the General Assembly “regarding adverse reactions reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.”
Strong will work to try and pass the bill next session, she said.
The bill would require the report contain: the total number of adverse reactions reported during the previous calendar year; an aggregated reporting of adverse reactions by immunization type, lot number, and age of recipient if the size of the data set allows; the total number and cost of emergency department visits related to reported adverse reactions; the total number of hospitalizations, permanent disabilities, and deaths related to reported adverse reactions; and a summary of activities undertaken by the Department to support Vermonters filing for compensation pursuant to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
The bill would require the health department to post the report to the legislature on its website and to provide electronic copies to all health care providers administering immunizations in Vermont.
Strong said she has friends and constituents who believe their children were injured by vaccines – some severely.
“What’s in those immunizations is as critical as the vaccinations themselves, there are preservatives, there’s DNA, there are metals,” said Strong. “They are being questioned around the world, particularly in Europe,” said Strong. “I think we’re behind the times on keeping up with some of the side effects.”
“These folks and myself are not anti-vaccination, we’re not anti-doctors or medical research or medical knowledge, we’re just saying there’s a lot going on here,” said Strong. “ What are we sacrificing in the name of immunizations?”
Join us and join the conversation in 2018.


**Examples of aggressive mass vaccination campaigns by the State of Vermont on Facebook, encourage people to undergo a medical procedure for the purported benefit of the baby. The comments were clearly coming from many people who do not believe they should be forced to take these shots. Links are provided so that you may read the comments.

Example 1


Example 2 https://www.facebook.com/HealthVermont/photos/a.172010419500430.37378.168922826475856/1731932290174894/?type=3&theater

Example 3 https://www.facebook.com/HealthVermont/photos/a.172010419500430.37378.168922826475856/1724494240918699/?type=3&theater

Vaccination should never be mandatory  it should always be a choice.

Jennifer Stella


Dec. 18, 2017: We need to talk.

We need to talk about vaccine injury awareness.

VAERS Bill, H.247, in the Vermont House Healthcare Committee will increase transparency and awareness of consumer vaccine injury reports filed by Vermonters. The bill will improve oversight upon the unseen outcomes and hidden costs of Vermont’s Immunization Program. While not all reports can be proven to be caused by the vaccine(s) given, underreporting and failure to recognize vaccine injury is a widespread problem. Ask your elected rep to support H.247~!


Recent Vermont VAERS reports – examples.

This poor baby got EIGHT (8) vaccines at once. She developed a high fever and was unwell for a week. Are there any long term effects? VAERS ID 702895:

This four-year old was given TEN vaccines at one time on Oct. 2, 2017. The report is made about the ensuing fever and vomiting the child experienced. VAERS ID 718104

Do you have a vaccine injury experience to share or a VAERS report filed?

Please contact us. We need to talk.

Who is responsible for following these reactions? What are the long term outcomes? What are the associated costs?



Today’s vaccine schedule is nothing like what it used to be.

For example, many vaccines are given in combination, many now contain aluminum adjuvant – and the emerging science is very concerning. This year, scientists from the University of Keele and King’s College of London published a peer-reviewed report on Aluminum (Al) in brain tissue in autism. They measured Al in brain tissue in brain tissue from donors who died with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder,and they have identified the location of Al in these tissues. Their findings are troubling, since many vaccines contain aluminum (Al) adjuvants – typically Al hydroxide and/or Al phosphate nano particles.

We encourage you to be open and not closed towards understanding this very complex topic. There is a big difference between supporting vaccination versus supporting mandatory vaccination, particularly when there is the potential for grave and untoward side effects.

At our event on September 8th, people from all over New England told their stories.

Their experiences as vaccine consumers deserve to be heard.

Every body should be concerned about vaccine safety awareness.

Let’s talk!