Spring, 2015

Download, print and share – Brochure: Support Freedom.

Recent Science

Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

Essential Rights

by Jennifer Stella, May 1, 2012

Vermont’s philosophical exemption to vaccines has been available to Vermonters since the childhood immunization act was put into place in 1979 and has its roots in the conscientious objections of the smallpox era.  This is because any medical procedure that carries with it known risk, requires the informed consent of the patient or the parent. Vaccinations are meant to induce artificial immunity, but we must hold fast to our natural-born rights to regulate our own immune systems without interference from pharmaceutical products.

It is an issue of grave concern to the future of Vermont – the parenting generation, the young families who raise and educate their children - all of whom help drive the economy of this state, that anyone should propose removing this essential human right of vaccine choice. If Vermont goes through with the “S199 conference report“, it will be the first state in the country to limit the right to decline pharmaceutical products by predicating rights on an arbitrary trigger that has no legal precedent nor evidence-based effectiveness.

The conference committee has proposed to give the VT Health Commissioner (an unelected official) the sole power to SUSPEND the philosophical exemption if Vermont’s vaccination rates drop below 90% for MMR, DTap or TDaP. It also requires parents who use the philosophical or religious exemption to sign that they are putting their children and others at risk for vaccine preventable diseases and changes the very name, from “philosophical exemption” to “personal conviction.”

The 90% “trigger” has not been vetted with any public testimony. Only the requirement of a signature of a healthcare practitioner was vetted and was found to be not only unacceptable to all MD’s who testified, but also is largly viewed as an expensive and logistically challenging limit on a Vermonter’s free right to medical choice.

Vermont Coalition for Vaccine Choice is – as always – willing to collaborate with lawmakers and the Health Department. Since our inception in February in response to S199, a lot has come to light. Many coalition members shared their intense personal stories of vaccine reactions, experiences with autism and even death after vaccination.  Three (3) Vermonters died last year after vaccines, and none died from infectious disease.  After such an experience as S199, we see clearly  that the conversation on vaccines and infectious disease prevention should be drastically different from what it has become.

Vermont;s Health Commissioner should be critically analyzing safety and efficacy data and the science in order to determine why states with high vaccination rates and no exemptions available to their citizens, still saw outbreaks of infectious diseases in the last year, and why some children die or are critically injured from vaccines, while others do not.

What about a Vermont Vaccine Working Group?  We could collaborate to work on:

  •  How best to support the families of the two children and one adult who died and others who have been injured, after receiving vaccines in 2011;
  • Formation of a “first response” adverse event reporting system within Vermont and investigation of all reports; and
  • Financial support for studies (securely separated from any special interest groups and pharma) on long-term health outcomes using vaccines.

A working group would of course include:

  • Citizen Stakeholder participation.  At least 10 citizens (eg., a cross section of parents who have vaccine damaged, immunocompromised and healthy children from all over the state);  and
  • The Health Department and a wide variety of healthcare practitioners:  medical doctors, naturopathic doctors, chiropractors, herbalists, nutritionists, homeopaths, midwives, nurses; etc.

Entire communities need to be informed about immune challenged children and the importance of keeping sick kids with infectious conditions out of schools. Because it isn’t just the vaccine “preventable” illnesses that are dangerous. A stomach flu, herpes infection or even a cold can all be dangerous to a person with a compromised immune system.  Vaccine shedding should be looked at as part of this group, and recommendations for staying at home until shedding has stopped so that we do not spread genetically engineered viruses.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

Choice or Responsibility?

photo-51Tuesday, March 31, 2015 – UVM – Med Ed 200 @noon – Event Info

What sort of debate is a non-debate?

Two very pro-mandatory vaccine supporters in one room lecturing med students… where is the debate going to happen? On the picket line in the parking lot?

Bob Macauley: “I believe that parents should be free to decide” (but) “objecting parents” should “not be able to imperil other children” by  “sending their unimmunized children to school.”

Rebecca Bell: “The good news is that vaccines have been widely studied and we have lots of data showing they are safe and effective. The bad news is that there is a lot of scary and inaccurate information about vaccines on the internet. With this kind of misinformation out there, how do parents find answers to their questions?”

Are medical ethics changing in Vermont?

Moral coercion should not be used to gain compliance in what should be a voluntary medical procedure. Vaccines should be a personal choice. Vermont law,  thankfully guarantees that personal choice. Respect for autonomy is the basis for informed consent. By judging morals, you intrude upon the patient autonomy and the private medical decisions of individuals and parents on what happens to their bodies or their children.

Proponents assert that children who are unvaccinated “not only put themselves at risk for vaccine-preventable diseases but they increase the risk to others.”

…however, if you believe vaccination will prevent disease, and you have your child vaccinated, then according to your belief your child has nothing to worry about. And the immunocompromised should be aware that vaccinated people can carry and transmit whooping cough, live influenza vaccine virus, live measles virus, live mumps virus, live rubella virus, live oral polio vaccine, live oral rotavirus vaccine…; unvaccinated people who did not intentionally infect themselves are far less a health risk to those with immune systems that are not functioning.

Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

March, 2015

Find your lawmaker contact information, HERE.

Join Us

Get on the mailing list – Click to subscribe.

Make a donation to support our 2015-2016 lobby efforts >>>>>>

  • Checks may be sent to: VCVC, PO Box 74, Waitsfield, VT 05673.

Support Medical Freedom.

Why must we ask for permission to say “no, thanks” to mandatory medicine?

cooltext115385657640614 “…We affirm the right for all individuals, including parents and guardians on behalf of children or incapacitated adults , to prior, free and informed consent to vaccination, which is a preventive medical procedure. We oppose any law or policy that would coerce people to vaccinate against their religious, philosophical, medical or personal beliefs…”

Click here to view full statement.

cooltext115414055688534… for Trace Amounts, April 21st @ the Roxy in Burlington, Vermont, 7 pm.

From the Mad Hatter Syndrome in the late 1800’s, to Pink Disease in the first half of the 20th to the Iraqi Grain Incident in the early 1970’s, humans have learned time and again of the debilitating neurological and physical damage that mercury can cause. Then why and how did it end up in our childhood vaccines? Trace Amounts explores the origin of the use of mercury in the vaccines and exposes the continued greed based decision to keep mercury in the vaccines through several decades. Could a tragedy, which brought one of the greatest nations to its knees and stole a generation of children, have been avoided? Watch Trace Amounts and you decide. Advance Ticket Sales Only will guarantee a seat. Visit: http://gathr.us/screening/10860.


It’s ok to “support immunizations” and still support the Right to Choose by keeping the program VOLUNTARY – with philosophical and religious exemptions from mandatory medicine.

This website is a place to start exploring the science that the industry refuses to acknowledge, the science they do not want parents to consider when making these important decisions for their children. Thanks for visiting!

  • Do Vaccines Promote Health? 
  • Dr. Suzanne Humphries in Burlington, Vermont, October, 2014
  • Full Video (2 h) – watch now.
    • Part 1 (15 mins) – watch now.
    • Part 2
    • Part 3
    • Part 4
    • Part 5
    • Part 6

Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

February, 2015

NEW! Toolkit – use this information to advocate for your rights.

Legislative Update:

  • February Update, WGDR radio. (~ 2/16/2015~)
  • The science is not settled.  (~
  • Pandemic Preparedness – is it about health? (ACLU, 2008 ~)


Action Needed:

– Oppose H98/S53 “Reportable Disease Registries and Data“(…more)

– Amend S9, – crime of “failure to protect” (…more)

Oppose H.212, Repeal of philosophical & religious exemptions (…more)

Read Bill Text:

  • Which is Greater Threat, Measles or Measles Vaccine? by Jeffrey Dach, M.D. (…more)
  • Is Discussing the Safety of Vaccines the Third Rail of Pediatrics?
    by Lawrence D. Rosen, M.D. (…more)
  • What is the Philosophical Exemption? (…more)
  • Freedom of Conscience. (more)

Screen shot 2015-02-14 at 1.38.03 AM

“Vaccine choice” is not about political affiliation, or economic status.

It is an issue of civil rights and of parental rights.

Will you protect the human right to informed consent in medical risk taking…?

 (click HERE for information on how to have your concerns be heard by lawmakers…)

2/8/2015: March of Dimes, AAP, VAHHS, Building Bright Futures Representative call for repeal of philosophical vaccine exemptions in Vermont…click here for more.

2/7/2015 – Greg Dobbs: In defense of parents who don’t vaccinate (Denver Post)


Studies Show that Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease (Weston A. Price Foundation).

Protecting the Immunocompromised: (see page 113 – Johns Hopkins Medicine recommends avoiding the recently vaccinated).

Spotlight on measles 2010: Excretion of vaccine strain measles virus in urine and pharyngeal secretions of a child with vaccine associated febrile rash illness, Croatia, March 2010

“We describe excretion of measles vaccine strain Schwarz in a child who developed a febrile rash illness eight days after primary immunisation against measles, mumps and rubella. Throat swabs and urine specimens were collected on the fifth and sixth day of illness, respectively. Genotyping demonstrated measles vaccine strain Schwarz (genotype A). If measles and rubella were not under enhanced surveillance in Croatia, the case would have been either misreported as rubella or not recognised at all.”

<>Do Vaccines Promote Health?<> –  (our questions start at 17:22 – link to VPR). 


January, 2015

When a measles vaccine fails to protect, who should be blamed? (read more…)

Want to help protect your right to informed consent in Vermont? Sign up here for updates.

Protect your right to informed medical decision making.

Central to the right of informed consent is the right to decline consent. In practicality with current vaccination laws, this translates into the right to exercise vaccine exemptions when state laws call for mandatory vaccines. Vermont law grants parents the right to exercise both religious and philosophical objections.

We are the individual human Voices for Vaccine Choice in Vermont. We are active community members and a vital part of the Vermont economy – the young families and future of vermont.

We are not “anti-vaxxers.”

There is no “Anti-Vaccination Movement” (read more). However, despite S199/Act 157 (2012), vaccine risk information offered to Vermont parents continues to be truncated and downplayed. When parents have questions and concerns about the health effects of vaccines, they are uniformly told: “the benefits far outweigh the risks”.  However, vaccines can and do cause unexpected side effects.

Do Vaccines Promote Health?

Public health officials aggressively market “routine” baby vaccines and insist they are safe and effective. However, an alarming “new normal” of chronic illness has more and more parents choosing to opt out of some – or all – of the many vaccines purchased and mandated for their children by the state. Bearing witness to the staggering rise in cases of children with allergies, asthma, eczema, ADHD, autism and other chronic autoimmune and neurological disorders, parents are asking: Do vaccines really promote long-term health?

We seek to protect informed consent by providing educational forums and by sharing published, peer-reviewed scientific information and news about the health effects and health outcomes of vaccination. Today’s doctors are not trained to recognize vaccine reactions; children and families suffer as a result.

1/22/2015: India – “There are several cases of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) like this, but they don’t get reported.” – AhmedabadMirror/ download .pdf

1/18/2015: Flu vaccine paradox adds to public health debate: “Canadian problem” an example of odd effects of prior vaccinationCBC News


1/7/2015: Opening Day in the VT Legislature (read more…)

1/7/2015: “She was healthy. She had a flu shot,” said Amber McCarthy, Ayzlee’s mother. “The whole thing is so unreal.” ‘Healthy’ Iowa 3-year-old dies from flu (Des Moines Register)

- This year, Vermont taxpayers will buy $13,411,296 worth of vaccines from the CDC through KidsVax, paying $352,290 in fees (report). Insurance companies will be billed for these costs, which will in turn be put into the health insurance rates in the form of an assessment.

Record Number Of Whooping Cough Cases In San Diego County Despite Immunization… Over 80% of victims were up to date on their DTaP / TDaP shots (KBPS.)… in Vermont, 90% of victims had been vaccinated (VTDigger.)

- Government Accountability Office Issues Report on Vaccine Injury Compensation: “Most Claims Took Years…” (read the full report).

- Green Mountain Care Board to vote on Data privacy. Meeting is Thurs., 1-8-2015 at 11 am (read more).

Maine, 1-2-2015: “Which vaccines a parent gives to their child and when those vaccines are given is their prerogative as a parent. We can’t assume a parent is ignorant simply because they choose to vaccinate their children on a different schedule than the template laid out by the CDC. – Maine Rep. Deborah Sanderson.

New Hampshire, 1-4-2015: Advocates call for opt-out. Years in the making, N.H. immunization registry hits snag during rulemaking (Concord Monitor).

Last in health, Mississippi strives to add conscious belief vaccine exemption (HB 130).

Flu Shot or Not?

Are you considering whether you should get a flu shot or not? Have you recently been made to feel guilty about not “taking the protection”?


(Note: this is not medical advice, but a compilation of information and opinion written by citizens for health choice.)


There are multiple types of flu shots and methods of administration, and ingredients differ.

A table with some of the ingredients is below, to get you started on your research.
Source: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm094045.htm

When viral proteins are injected into the body, the immune system learns to recognize them (sensitization) and then on subsequent exposure to the proteins it begins to attack them (elicitation). Unfortunately, any other proteins injected with the vaccine are treated the same way. Once sensitized to the injected protein, future exposure to the protein elicits an attack known as an allergic reaction. References are below:

Smith-Norowitz TA, Wong D, Kusonruksa M, Norowitz KB, Joks R, Durkin HG, Bluth MH. Long Term Persistence of IgE Anti-Influenza Virus Antibodies in Pediatric and Adult Serum Post Vaccination with Influenza Virus Vaccine. Int J Med Sci 2011; 8(3):239-244. doi:10.7150/ijms.8.239. Available from http://www.medsci.org/v08p0239.htm

More details and references are here: http://foodallergycauses.wordpress.com/category/food-allergy-causes/

Intranasal vaccines apply spray close to your olfactory nerve that is millimeters away from your brain. There have been previous cases of adventitious agents in a vaccine and given that we can only test for what we know there may remains a risk of unintentional contamination of the vaccine by viruses/bacteria/amoeba/prion/etc.

Intradermal: skin cells/proteins may be torn by the needle and injected along with the vaccine.
If your body develops an allergy to these skin proteins, you can develop immune system related skin disorders such as eczema.

Intramuscular: skin and muscle cells/proteins may be torn by the needle and injected along with the vaccine. If your body develops an allergy to these muscle proteins (one of which is tropomyosin), you can develop immune system disorders as the immune system attacks any tissue containing tropomyosin. Tropomyosin is present in the brain and the intestines. So disorders can include autism, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome etc.
and of course seafood allergy.

Polysorbate 80 contains vegetable oils. Depending on the type of vegetable oil used, it can cause the development of allergies to various food items – food allergies.

Ovalbumin in vaccines can cause the development of allergy to egg.

Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen but your body creates a small amount of it too.

Mercury is a well known toxin for which there is no safe amount.

Triton X-100 can damage cells.

HA is the viral protein. The “active ingredient” of a flu vaccine.

Insect proteins when injected into the body can cause the development of allergy to those insect proteins.
Flublok uses cells from the Fall Armyworm, a type of moth larvae. If you develop an allergy to such an insect protein, it may be very difficult to avoid exposure. Avoiding exposure to egg for a patient with egg allergies is difficult enough. How would one avoid exposure to a moth/larvae protein?

Flucelvax contains dog kidney cell proteins. If you develop an allergy to dog kidney cell protein, your immune system might start attacking your own similar kidney cells. An autoimmune kidney disorder will result.

Also the dog kidney cells used to make the vaccine are highly tumorigenic. The cells are supposed to be all killed. But even the tumorigenic DNA residue in the vaccine is considered dangerous and is therefore limited by the FDA to 10 nanogram. Is that low enough?

Trivalent vaccines contain three viral strains and quadrivalent contain four viral strains.

If you want to perform some probability calculations, flu vaccines work 60% of the time per the CDC.

Recent science tells us that the flu may become a lot more deadly to those who have been repeatedly vaccinated.

In the old days before vaccines, you had no choice but to suffer the flu if you caught it.
Modern medicine gives you the choice as to whether you wish to intentionally expose your body, despite the fact that the long-term consequences of repeated influenza vaccination are unknown.


1) Standard Trivalent vaccine protects against three strains of the flu virus ( two type A’s and one Type B) and comes in two forms. Multidose vial which uses thimerisol as a preservative and single dose vial which does not. There is no real difference here since thimerisol has been conclusively shown not to cause autism as some tried to claim. Doctors often prefer the mutidose vial because its less expensive and since vaccines are a major cost to most practices ( and one we often lose money on).

2) Quadravalent vaccine protects again 4 strains of the flu ( Two A and Two B) and there for may offer more protection in some seasons. It is more expensive and may not be available everywhere so if its not available its best to get the Trivalent since the difference is not critical.

3) Nasal Spray Flu Vaccine – Unlike other flu vaccines this is a live attenuated virus vaccine so there is a small but not zero chance that immune compromised individuals could catch the flu if they got this vaccine. This is the preferred vaccine for children age 2-8 yrs old but is not approved for anyone under 2 yrs old or over 50 yrs old. It may offer slightly better protection than the standard trivalent vaccine

4) FluBlok – This is another trivalent vaccine approved for patients 18-49 yrs old. This vaccine is manufatured using a new technique which does not require the use of eggs so it is a good alternative for patients who are allergic to eggs.

5) High Dose Vaccine – This vaccine uses a higher dose fo the antigens to produce greater immunity It is useful in older patients since they do not respond as well to vaccines. It seems to increase protection by about 25%


Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

Wakefield et al, and Scientific Rigor

December 15, 2014 by Shawn Siegel

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, praised and still soundly supported by the parents of the Lancet kids, is characterized as a fraud in the mainstream, virtually solely on the basis of the case series published in, and subsequently retracted from, the Lancet, but the science of the paper – the validity of the data collected and conclusions drawn – was never in question. Indeed, it was praised by Richard Horton, the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, both in interviews and in his testimony at the General Medical Council hearing.

This is from the online Huffington Post article linked below, authored by journalist Sally Beck:

“[Horton made comments] in an interview with me for The Observer newspaper, and in a written email to an epidemiologist seeking clarification on whether the science in the Wakefield study held up. [He] was quick to confirm that the science in the paper, which looked at whether 12 autistic children also suffered bowel disease, was good.

“He reiterated his statement in his evidence to the GMC, ‘There was no question in my mind that subject to external peer review and editor debate, we should publish this work,’ he said. ‘The description of what seemed to be a new syndrome and its relations to possible environmental triggers was original and would certainly have interested our readers.'”

And the following is an excerpt from a document I received from Martin Walker, who edited the books, Silenced Witnesses, numbers 1 and 2, which are the stories of the parents of the Lancet kids. Martin attended the full GMC hearing – this is his description of Horton’s testimony, corroborating and expanding on the comments in the Huffington Post article:

“According to Horton, his enquiry into Deer’s allegations left him sure that at least one of the most serious was completely fictitious. From that point onwards, in real life and in the hearing, Horton gave impeccable evidence for the defence. In fact he rose to a level of praise for Dr Wakefield the like of which I have only previously heard from parents.

“When Horton moved to talking about the paper published in the Lancet, it became clear that he had the highest regard for the method which the ‘case series’ used and the way in which it was presented. If the prosecution was expecting him to say that the paper was full of poor science, they must have been surprised when he said the absolute opposite.

“Horton said that the Lancet paper was an excellent example of a ‘case series’. That this was a standard and entirely reputable way of reporting on a possible new syndrome. He said unequivocally that the science reported in the 1998 Lancet paper ‘still stands’ and that he ‘wished, wished, wished’ that the clock could be turned back and the paper be considered in the light it was first presented, without everything that followed.”

The headlines blasted around the world vilifying Dr. Wakefield should instead have been trumpeting the success enjoyed by the team of doctors at the Royal Free Hospital in London, the families of the kids who participated, and certainly the children themselves, when the treatments for their inflamed bowels resulted in amelioration of their symptoms of autism; when kids who hadn’t been able to sleep through the night for months began getting a full night’s sleep; when kids who hadn’t spoken for months – or longer – again began speaking, and speaking with language usage commensurate with their age at the time, not at the age at which they’d stopped speaking!, demonstrating continued mental growth despite the outward appearance of absence; and when kids who’d lost emotional connection with their families once again began recognizing and bonding with their parents and siblings.

Priorities, folks – priorities.




Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

December, 2014

“Since fiscal year 1999, HHS has added six vaccines to the vaccine injury table, but it has not added covered injuries associated with these vaccines to the table. This means that while individuals may file VICP claims for these vaccines, each petitioner must demonstrate that the vaccine that was administered caused the alleged injury. HHS is considering adding covered injuries associated with these vaccines; but as of September 2014, it had not published any final rules to do so.

The balance of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund, managed by the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) increased from $2.9 billion in fiscal year 2009 to nearly $3.3 billion at the end of fiscal year 2013 as the trust fund’s income (from net revenues from vaccine excise taxes and interest on investments) outpaced its disbursements to HHS, USCFC, and the Department of Justice (DOJ), which represents HHS in VICP proceedings. VICP compensation, funded by the trust fund, increased from less than $126 million in each of fiscal years 1999 to 2009 to over $254 million in fiscal year 2013.”

  • US DHHS Decree: Immunity under U.S. law against legal claims related to the manufacturing, testing, development, distribution and administration of three experimental Ebola vaccines (Yahoo Finance)
  • CDC announces to doctors that the current flu vaccine may not protect against today’s predominately circulating H3N2 influenza virus (CBS This Morning)
  • Dec 4, 2014: European agency clears Novartis vaccine in Italy scare (France 24)
  • Novartis flu vaccine on hold in Italy after suspicious deaths (CIDRAP)
  • Study: Epidemic of complicated mumps in previously vaccinated young adults in the South-West of France (Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, December 2014)
  • Study, Tdap vaccination during pregnancy: small but statistically significant increased risk of chorioamnionitis (1-Medscape, 2-Dr. Halvorsen)
  • Petitions Received for Vaccine Injury Compensation Program  (Federal Register)
Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off

Latest News

  • 11/28/2014: Novartis flu vaccine suspended in Italy after deaths: Swiss drugmaker stresses that “no causal link” has been discovered between vaccine and deaths (Telegraph, UK)
  • Pathogen evolution and the immunological niche (Annuals of the NY Academy of Science, 2014)
  • Lawsuits claiming Merck lied about mumps vaccine efficacy headed to trial (read more…)
  • 11/16/2014: AP IMPACT: ‘Vaccine court’ keeps claimants waiting
  • Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Enhances Colonization of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in Mice http://mbio.asm.org/content/5/1/e01040-13.full (this is an animal study on the flu vaccine which is now recommended to all babies and children.)
  • 11/18/2014: New study strongly suggests hepatitis B vaccination in ‪‎France‬ sparked a wave of new cases of MS <!–more–>
  • Why is vaccine choice so important? Download our brochure, here.

View  Video Collection – View List of Recommended Books

  • What Kind of Life is a Lifetime of Vaccines? (Read more).
  • Post-MMR “Febrile seizures represent a serious adverse event…” (Nature Genetics, 2014)
  • Example of major differences in opinion between those who support choice based on the science, and those who support mandatory vaccination for MMR, DTaP, IPV, HIB, PCV, HepB, ChickenPox, and anything new the Vermont CDC plans to add (meningitis, HPV): Vermont parents are required to read the Dept. of Health’s vaccine education document before “opting out” of any one of the 30 vaccines they will be asked to get to attend preschool (see VT schedule up to 18 months). Here is one coalition parent’s annotated version of the education document.
  • Costly chronic disease in children is exploding. Pre-Order your video of Explore the Facts Lecture.
  • Nurses Against Mandatory Vaccines (NAMV) – San Diego Protest on 11-01-2014 
  • Concerned Vermonter Responds to Brattleboro Reformer
  • CDC wants VT children to have 49 vaccines before kindergarten.
  • Read the Vermont-reported injuries/hospitalizations from last 5 years here.
  • Vaccine Ingredients and Manufacturer Information via www.procon.org
  • Anaphylaxis to diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccines among children with cow’s milk allergy (Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology).
  • Drug Makers Seek Indemnity for Ebola Vaccines (London South East).
  • “The public and the media need to be more skeptical of industry claims and be wary of hype that over promises.” – (from: Corruption of the Health Care Delivery System” by Doctors Glyn Elwyn and Elliott Fisher of The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice).
  • Influenza: marketing vaccine by marketing disease (British Medical Journal).
  • Is Enterovirus D68 Behind The Mysterious Paralysis In Children? (www.NCPR.org).
  • At the end of 2013, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil had generated nearly 30,000 adverse reaction reports to the US government, including 140 deaths (www.Medalerts.org).
Posted in Vaccine Issues by RR. Comments Off